Review seller discretionary earnings, test common add-backs, and see how unsupported adjustments can distort debt support and buyer cash flow.
Adjusted SDE can make a weak deal look stronger than it is.
Start with 3 free deal screens. No credit card required.
Seller discretionary earnings, or SDE, is often used in SMB acquisition analysis to estimate owner-benefit cash flow before financing.
It can be useful, but it is not proof. SDE is only as strong as the financials, adjustments, and support behind it.
Add-backs can change the entire deal. A business that looks average on reported earnings can look attractive after adjustments.
That is exactly why buyers need an SDE sanity check. Adjusted SDE can make a weak deal look stronger than it is.
Some add-backs are reasonable. Others are wishful thinking. The buyer has to separate personal expenses, true one-time costs, market-rate replacement costs, owner compensation, and expenses that will continue after close.
A weak add-back does more than inflate earnings. It can also inflate debt support, buyer confidence, and the price a buyer is willing to defend.
Assume a listing starts with $600,000 of reported SDE and adds back $150,000 of seller expenses. The headline adjusted SDE becomes $750,000.
If outside review supports only $80,000 of those adjustments and the buyer needs $120,000 of replacement management, the practical cash-flow starting point becomes $560,000: $600,000 plus $80,000, less $120,000. That $190,000 difference can materially change DSCR, financing support, and the price a buyer can defend.
A seller or broker can present add-backs in a CIM, teaser, or listing. That does not mean a lender, CPA, or diligence provider will accept them.
Lender-reviewed add-backs matter because debt support depends on adjustments that can survive outside review. See how those adjustments affect SBA cash flow and DSCR supportability.
ADE looks for signals that reported earnings, SDE, adjusted EBITDA, and add-backs need more support before the buyer trusts the output.
It can flag weak financial quality, unsupported adjustments, lender-readiness gaps, and situations where a deal only works after aggressive assumptions.
ADE is not a CPA, lender, QoE provider, or diligence report. It helps the buyer identify pressure points before LOI.
A serious buyer still needs accounting review, lender review, source documents, tax returns, bank statements, and judgment before relying on adjusted earnings.
Screen an SMB acquisition before LOI with structured checks for financing, earnings quality, owner dependence, lender risk, and missing proof.
Review SBA acquisition cash flow supportability, DSCR, management compensation, reserves, and conservative earnings basis before lender review.
Use a practical CIM and teaser checklist to identify missing financial evidence, owner dependence, customer concentration, and lender-readiness gaps.
See why acquisition buyers need structured underwriting discipline, evidence states, DSCR consistency, and advisor judgment beyond generic AI summaries.
Compare generic AI deal summaries with a structured acquisition decision framework for extraction, underwriting, debt support, and advisor handoff.
Prepare acquisition assumptions, supported facts, open questions, and advisor handoff materials before LOI discussions.
Screen lower middle market acquisitions for adjusted EBITDA quality, capital stack pressure, DSCR, sponsor equity, QoE readiness, and management depth.